Difference between revisions of "Template talk:MainSection Nav/layout navigation bar Mainsection/reply"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I agree ALL those changes are good.
+
I agree ALL those changes are good.<br>
I've always intended to reorganize characters types into a main type called Pawns, and a page called Pawns (or Pawn, subtle difference, but significant). But there are several pages to consider updating and/or renaming, specifically [[Characters]], [[Character Types]], [[Human]], and [[Colonist]]. Even raiders and prisoners have their own page. It'll take a bit of planning to sort it all out, but for now I would stick with the Pawns link exactly as you have it there.
+
I've always intended to reorganize characters types into a main type called Pawns, and a page called Pawns (or Pawn, subtle difference, but significant). But there are several pages to consider updating and/or renaming, specifically [[Characters]], [[Character Types]], [[Human]], and [[Colonist]]. Even raiders and prisoners have their own page. It'll take a bit of planning to sort it all out, but for now I would stick with the Pawns (character types) link exactly as you have it there.

Latest revision as of 15:04, 13 October 2016

I agree ALL those changes are good.
I've always intended to reorganize characters types into a main type called Pawns, and a page called Pawns (or Pawn, subtle difference, but significant). But there are several pages to consider updating and/or renaming, specifically Characters, Character Types, Human, and Colonist. Even raiders and prisoners have their own page. It'll take a bit of planning to sort it all out, but for now I would stick with the Pawns (character types) link exactly as you have it there.