Topic on Talk:Refused classification
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Albedo in the topic "Possibility of Appeal" on Talk:Refused classification.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@ Ty et al - | @ Ty et al - | ||
| − | I want to draw your attention to the Wikipedia article on ACB-banned games, specifically the reference to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games_in_Australia#Overturned Disco Elysium: The Final Cut's successful appeal]. It appears(?) that RimWorld has similar "negative impact" mechanics in place for most drug use, and, if so, there is a strong possibility, or at the very least a precedent, for a successful appeal on this matter. [[User:Albedo|Albedo]] ([[User talk:Albedo|talk]]) 20:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC) | + | I want to draw your attention to the Wikipedia article on ACB-banned games, specifically the reference to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_video_games_in_Australia#Overturned Disco Elysium: The Final Cut's successful appeal]. It appears(?) that RimWorld has similar "negative impact" mechanics in place for most drug use (e.g. addiction, heart attacks, etc.), and, if so, there is a strong possibility, or at the very least a precedent, for a successful appeal on this matter. [[User:Albedo|Albedo]] ([[User talk:Albedo|talk]]) 20:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC) |