Editing Template talk:Stub

== Reason omit error ==

Probably better to put in a talk page.

So the main issues I have putting an error for no reason is:
* There are dozens of articles with just stub. Basically I don't think anyone is gonna update them. It looks even uglier as a viewer becauses the error is clearly not meant to be seen, but pages tend to not be updated for months at a time
* (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type
* There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically?
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 * (As an editor) Reaching for the | and = keys are annoying to type
 * There are times where I don't know what it is. Putting "general stub" isn't any more helpful tan simply putting the template, it causes the same problem. Therefore, why not let the template do it automatically?
-== Stub overuse ==
-Right now the wiki has 1473 content pages. It also has marked 719 of those articles as stubs. Almost exactly 50%. I think the stub template is ''wildly'' overused. Are really half the articles here so short on information to be deserving of a stub status? I certainly think not. Some of them could be chapters in a book, yet here they are marked as stubs. I don't think this makes sense. All articles can be expanded upon in some way probably, but that doesn't mean they should be given a stub status. Stub ought to be used for truly "too short" articles, very bareboned ones. [[User:Pangaea|Pangaea]] ([[User talk:Pangaea|talk]]) 16:52, 22 November 2022 (UTC)